Monday, August 22, 2011

5 Common Barriers Inhibiting Revenue Performance






I was playing golf recently at Bandon Dunes with the CEO of a major Chicago based firm. During our match, he asked me if I could name a few of the common issues I see in my engagements. Maybe he was just trying to distract me, it was match play after all, but I thought he was truly interested, so I told him I had seen barriers that seemed to be present frequently, usually fixable but all causing many issues for many firms, Among them were:

1. The Alignment Problem:
The alignment between the goals/expectations and compensation plans. Often CEO’s tell me their sales force just isn’t firing on all eight cylinders, and could I help them by replacing them with better, more capable people, or maybe get them on track with more focused training or perhaps more discipline. When I get engaged I see a significant misalignment between what the sales force is being asked to do and how they are being paid. Compensation plan design is not often a core competency for senior management for a number of reasons, but infrequently do those without the experience and ability to design a good plan call on those who have the skill for guidance. It’s not an especially difficult issue to solve, but far more often than not it needs solving!

2. The Collaborative Model:
The failure of management to lead, thinking they need to manage and often confusing the two. Far too many salespeople feel like they’re in the vast blue ocean of competition all by themselves and have nobody to turn to for collaboration. Sales meetings are “account reviews” with a senior manager whose perceived goal is to ask all the tough questions and uncover their failures and shortcomings. It’s rarely a pretty sight nor is it an especially productive session. Management needs to contribute their skills, experience and position, forming a team with the sales staff, who have an obligation to keep the rest of the organization informed and involved. This collaborative model has a much better chance of success then the hierarchical model so many of us grew up under. Management needs to accept the responsibility of helping move the account forward to a close, rather than just passing judgment on performance.

3. The “Like” Factor:
People have for too long espoused the theory that people buy from those they “like” -- little could be further from the truth. People buy from people they have confidence in and in whose judgment they trust and in whom
they believe can add value to their requirements, offering them a solution that is better than they originally expected. It’s the real role of an expert salesperson -- to deliver a solution that exceeds the customers’ expectations and provides them with a solution better then they knew existed. It really doesn’t matter if it’s a retail environment or a sophisticated commercial transaction, the goal of sales should be the same, to provide a solution that exceeds the customers’ expectations/requirements .The “like” thing may very well happen, but a professional is what the customer wants, not a friend! Salespeople get the “like” message that their organization is delivering and begins focusing on getting the customer to like them, and then the lunches and golfing and all those activities that have little to do with closing the deal start.
The corollary is true as well, the customer finally comes to believe he has a special “friendship” with the salesperson, and when the rules change for whatever reason, he feels he’s been abandoned or worse, and that creates even more issues. I see this frequently in the banking world, as an example, and when the terms of the loan are changed, or new covenants are imposed, the customer can’t figure out why his “good friends” bank did that to him.

4. Much Too Focused On Features & Benefits:
Another common problem is organizations that focus nearly entirely on training on the features and benefits of their products, with a smattering of competitive reviews. The result is salespeople who are automatons when it comes to reciting the attributes of their products, what they haven’t done is learn how to listen, develop and solution that surpasses the customers’ expectations, build a plan that serves the customer and wins the deal. It’s really rarely about features, they are important, to be sure, but important only as one component in meeting the customers’ needs.

5. The Failure of Technology:
And finally, I mention the failure of technology. People who have experience, and with it a bit of age, seem to rely on their “tried and true” methods, not realizing the world has largely passed them by and they can no longer win business on the sheer force of their personality. They seem to take a perverse pleasure in rejecting the advantage technology brings them. They are staring at their own obsolesce and don’t even know it. Just is bad is the younger salespeople who rely too heavily on technology, thinking an email is all that is necessary. Largely, it seems, using available technology to “put the ball in somebody else’s court” as they say. Apparently thinking that once they’ve launched an email, their task is essentially done. Both are failing because of their perception of the value of technology. One undervalues it; one places too much value on it.

So, there you have it, the five most common hurdles I see that act as barriers to achieving great performance. All can be fixed, but they must first be recognized, and then dealt with.